Stug IIIG or Panthers
5 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Stug IIIG or Panthers
Keep in mind Mid War.
510 for 3 StuGs - range 32", AT 11, RoF 2, FP 3+
550 for 2 Panthers - range 32", AT 14, RoF 2, FP 3+
Whats the better deal? 4 shots at AT 14, or 6 at AT 11? I'm thinking the higher output of shots is best, considering most tanks in MW are Front Armor 6 at best.
Also, Panther have better front/side armor, but same top. So are just as vulnerable. And really, StuGs at range are armor 8 - pretty solid..
Thoughts?
510 for 3 StuGs - range 32", AT 11, RoF 2, FP 3+
550 for 2 Panthers - range 32", AT 14, RoF 2, FP 3+
Whats the better deal? 4 shots at AT 14, or 6 at AT 11? I'm thinking the higher output of shots is best, considering most tanks in MW are Front Armor 6 at best.
Also, Panther have better front/side armor, but same top. So are just as vulnerable. And really, StuGs at range are armor 8 - pretty solid..
Thoughts?
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Well sounds like we will have to face Churchills and KV-1..
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
They all terrify an American player equally, so having more of them is likely better.
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
StuHs are even better against yanks!
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
I so wished the Americans had taken a page from Germany and made some decent AT tanks, not just on squishy TD platforms. Would kill to have a panther-esque equivalent for US.
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Well if BF ever get into late-late war you might have the Pershing
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Their guesstimate stats:
armour: 11/5/1
gun: RoF 2, AT 12, 3+
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Their guesstimate stats:
armour: 11/5/1
gun: RoF 2, AT 12, 3+
Last edited by Diragi on Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:03 pm; edited 1 time in total
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Hmmm prior to the M36 coming out I'd agree with AT 12, but I can see this thing being AT 14 if it ever comes out and that would be nice. Even the hellcats and M10s are AT 13 now, the 90mm guns should be a bit more 'punchy'
Hmmm purely for modelling wonder if anyone makes 1:100 Pershings yet?
Hmmm purely for modelling wonder if anyone makes 1:100 Pershings yet?
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
hetzers are late war, i'd go with panzer IV f1 they are the best vs churches and kv1s...
i'd say the panthers would be more of a threat then the stugs, but having 3 stugs is would be better vs non heavy targets.
Did you think of using a 1942 Schwere Panzer Platoon with 1 tiger and 1 panzer III N for 495 or 500 if you up it to M or L. I know the panzer III gun is only 9. The tiger ignores the panzer III if it gets destoryed. Its a little cheaper on pts but you have less higher end fire power.
i'd say the panthers would be more of a threat then the stugs, but having 3 stugs is would be better vs non heavy targets.
Did you think of using a 1942 Schwere Panzer Platoon with 1 tiger and 1 panzer III N for 495 or 500 if you up it to M or L. I know the panzer III gun is only 9. The tiger ignores the panzer III if it gets destoryed. Its a little cheaper on pts but you have less higher end fire power.
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
lothlann wrote:
Did you think of using a 1942 Schwere Panzer Platoon with 1 tiger and 1 panzer III N for 495 or 500 if you up it to M or L. I know the panzer III gun is only 9. The tiger ignores the panzer III if it gets destoryed. Its a little cheaper on pts but you have less higher end fire power.
thats an option......but has fewer high AT shots........
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Diragi wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Skytrex/ Command Decision? M26 Pershings,
They look awesome!!! Thanks Duane
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
I'd say StuG's as AT 14 vs Allies is overkill in MW... if it weren't red on blue, I don;t know if its so clear-cut.. but knowing you don;t have to face any Tigers and such is great. While yes there will be a few Churchills, they have a crap gun in MW (LW isnt so great either), so really they aren;t much of a threat to your AT assets..
Matt Varnish- Posts : 3475
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Is it confirmed that is 100% r v b or is going to be mixed up for rounds 2 & 3?
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
No idea, but I tell you what.. I'm not changing my list after pouring in the hours to get the Churchills done Just have markings left to do tonite on them, and then base infantry.
Matt Varnish- Posts : 3475
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
So, KVs, churchillls (i think Loius is bringing his also)........some heavy AT is not a bad idea....PaK40s maybe... or just take the Panthers.
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Dug in pak40s are my name of existance, lol. That's I bought them first for when I do Germans.
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
So yesterday Ca$h said he was spray painting tanks... He alread has StuGs, he already has Panthers.. so is there a MW list that can take Hetzers?
Matt Varnish- Posts : 3475
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Matt Varnish wrote:So yesterday Ca$h said he was spray painting tanks... He alread has StuGs, he already has Panthers.. so is there a MW list that can take Hetzers?
SSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
No one checks this forum anyways right At least I sleuthed it out.
So last night I went and painted the 8th army red 'rat' symbol and the ID number on all my churchills.. only to just now find out that Kingforce churchills didnt have them painted on when they went into battle (just found a pic of all 6 getting fueled up prior to their first battle). So I get to repaint over.. awesome.
So last night I went and painted the 8th army red 'rat' symbol and the ID number on all my churchills.. only to just now find out that Kingforce churchills didnt have them painted on when they went into battle (just found a pic of all 6 getting fueled up prior to their first battle). So I get to repaint over.. awesome.
Matt Varnish- Posts : 3475
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Then I'm stumped .. unless its 3 Ferdinands or something
Matt Varnish- Posts : 3475
Join date : 2012-04-24
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
I'd keep the rat symbols to awesome not to keep.
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Re: Stug IIIG or Panthers
Matt Varnish wrote:Then I'm stumped .. unless its 3 Ferdinands or something
That would be lamer than bringing 3 [s]kits[/s] KTs to two different tournaments!
Last edited by Diragi on Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:48 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : autocorrect fail)
Diragi- Posts : 2124
Join date : 2012-03-11
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum